Pew Report Shows: “Deportation Only” Immigration Approach Undermines Courts


Photo by kromatic.

A new report from the Pew Hispanic Center illustrates the degree to which the U.S. government is wasting money and manpower on the pursuit and punishment of undocumented immigrants who are non-violent and pose no threat to public safety or national security. According to the data in the Pew report, the federal government’s ever-intensifying (and unsuccessful) effort since the early 1990s to stop undocumented immigration through deportation-only policies has flooded the federal courts with immigrants from south of the border who are charged only with unlawfully entering or remaining in the United States. Even though “unlawful presence” and “entry without inspection” are usually civil and not criminal offenses, all violations of immigration law automatically fall under federal jurisdiction and are therefore channeled into the federal courts.

The filling of federal courts and prisons with non-violent undocumented immigrants is the primary reason that “immigration offenders” accounted for 24 percent of all people sentenced in federal courts in 2007—up from 7% in 1991.  From the standpoint of immigration policy, it is telling that 61% of the non-U.S. citizen Latino immigrants sentenced in federal courts in 2007 were sentenced for immigration offenses. Pew concludes that the growing number of Latinos who find themselves in federal court has come in large part “from a rise in the number of offenders sentenced for immigration offenses between 1991 and 2007.”

The Pew report reinforces the conclusion of a study released earlier this month by the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) that finds serious shortcomings in the National Fugitive Operations Program (NFOP), which is run by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security under a mandate to catch “dangerous fugitives.”  According to the MPI report, NFOP’s budget ballooned from $9 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 to $218 million in FY 2008, yet 73% of the 96,000 persons arrested so far have no criminal convictions.  Rather, they are simply undocumented immigrants who were “unlawfully present” in the United States.

The “deportation only” approach to controlling undocumented immigration has failed consistently for over a decade and a half.  Given that a century’s worth of research has shown again and again that immigrants are less likely to be criminals or behind bars than the native-born, it makes no sense to waste limited law-enforcement resources pursuing non-violent immigrants whose presence in the United States is simply a symptom of our broken immigration system. Criminals pose a threat; immigrants do not.

email

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed
  • Rufino Villarreal

    My story is to long to write, but I was an immigration lawyer in Omaha, Nebraska who used the law to help Mexicans obtain work permits and temporary legal residency. Through ignorance, prejudice, and Homeland Security’s insistence on its “deportation only” policy my use of the legal system to help our newly arrived immigrants obtain some breathing room and possibly permanent residency while in our country came to a sudden stop. My former clients by all accounts abided by our criminal laws and helped our economy. The method I used to help the new immigrants, was by using the administrative process that INS/DHS set up and applying the available laws. Because my method made the INS/DHS do to much work and violated their deportation only policy, I lost my carreer, marriage and health. If I would have used similar creativity and utilization of the law in the corporate world I would have been hailed a genius. If you do it to help the lowest rung of our society, you are deemed a unethical criminal. If you want to read my story email me at rjvrjv1956@yahoo.com.

Top