Which State is Really Going to Be the Next Arizona?

Written by on October 27, 2010 in Enforcement, Reform, State and Local with 3 Comments

Ever since SB1070 passed through the state legislature in Arizona, aspiring politicians and elected officials have jumped on the rhetorical bandwagon, promising similar legislation in their own states—no matter what the political or fiscal costs. No other state has actually passed copycat legislation, but many have made attempts and overtures towards that end. While observers are waiting to see how far states are willing to go in wrestling control over immigration away from the federal government and into their own hands, nothing will be certain until after next Tuesday’s election. It’s likely some are levying harsh immigration legislation purely as election-time talking points, but there are others who seem to have a bone to pick with immigrants and will likely stake their careers on the pursuit of “attrition through enforcement.”

Immigration Works USA has compiled a detailed analysis of which states are likely to pursue SB1070 legislation in the coming year. In their report, To Copy or Not To Copy? State Lawmaking on Immigration after SB1070 they have designated states as either “Danger List,” “Maybe, Maybe Not” or “Less Likely.” The report includes a summary of anecdotal state evidence to give readers a sense of why some states are veering dangerously close to becoming the next Arizona while others are more “bark than bite.”

Those the authors consider most in danger of becoming a “papers please” state are Georgia, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and South Carolina. They placed 14 other states on their “Maybe” list and 7 on their “Less Likely” list. This brings us to a total of 25 states to keep an eye on in the coming year.

As a coalition leader of business groups, it’s apropos that Immigration Works USA also includes an explanation of why these kinds of state laws are bad for business in the report. Drops in tourism revenues and booking inquiries along with the general controversy that SB1070 brought to the state, are a few reasons they give for avoiding an SB1070-style path to economic ruin. Hopefully as candidates turn away from electioneering to governing they will move back to a reasonable position on immigration and find a sensible way forward that is good for communities, as of course, business.

Photo by NinJA999.

Tags: ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed
  • Erica

    I attended a State subcommittee immigration hearing tonight in South Carolina aimed at getting public opinion on tougher state immigration laws. The people speaking who opposed tougher laws outnumbered those in favor 14-7. Unfortunately according to the opening statements made by the committee members, I don’t think that our voices in opposition were truly heard.

  • Tony W

    One of the most critical tasks in fighting these laws is keeping track of the hearings. In some states, like Missouri, committee chairs can intentionally short-circuit public input (yes, I am talking about you Rep. Jerry Nolte) only to pass bills on to a rubber-stamp legislature. Closely monitoring hearings half of the battle.


    I think it would be Oklahoma, due to a Gubernatorial race on which the Republican party nominee is Mary Fallin touted her support of Arizona’s immigration laws and the big-goverment policies of President Barack Obama. I also think due to the facts of our House Representatives majority are Republicans.
    So we are expecting four years of pure hell to the immigrants in the State of Oklahoma.They already has passed HB 1804.