Last week, Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), John Morton, reminded ICE officials of their duty and obligation to use good judgment in the prosecution of immigration cases. In a culture where many people still believe that “enforcing the law” and “removing people” are exactly the same, Morton’s new memo is likely to shake some things up. While the memo doesn’t change the law in any way or end controversial programs like Secure Communities, it does serve as a much-needed guide for ICE officials on how, when and why to exercise prosecutorial discretion in immigration cases.
In the memo, Morton reminds ICE officers and attorneys that they should never assume that they are powerless to affect the outcome of a case—instead, that authority rests with individual officers and attorneys to determine whether or not the positive factors in a given case outweigh the value of prosecuting that case. In fact, ICE officials need to do this regardless of whether or not immigrants or their attorney have asked for an exercise of prosecutorial discretion. The memo reiterates the need to triage cases based on ICE priorities, emphasizing the goal of putting limited resources into cases and activities that protect the country by going after those who seek to do it harm.
While Morton started down this road last year with a memo on enforcement priorities, the circumstances of this memo are significantly different. First, rather than simply reiterate the memos of past immigration officials, this memo synthesizes what has come before, offering a more detailed discussion of the nature of prosecutorial discretion, when it can be exercised, and what kind of factors should be taken into account. Second, the list of factors themselves is a more concrete framework for guiding decision-making. Government officials often like to couch admonishments to exercise good judgment in benign phrases like “totality of the circumstances” without giving concrete examples.
This time around, Morton lists 19 factors, ranging from age and when someone came to the country to community ties and likelihood of relief through a legal benefit in the future. In addition to this non-exhaustive list, the memo emphasizes that some factors should be red flags in a case, indicating the need to look and think carefully about whether it makes sense to go forward. These special factors include whether the person is a veteran or related to someone in the military, is a long time LPR, came to the United States at young age, is pregnant or nursing, has a serious physical or mental disability, is very young or very old, or has a serious health problem.
That’s a lot to take into account, but will likely have a profound impact on DREAM students (who fit into many of the categories listed), vulnerable populations caught up in the immigration system, and military families where family members are in removal proceedings even as a spouse or child is on active military duty. None of these folks have any new form of relief, but under this memo, the direction is clear—these are important factors to take into account when exercising judgment.
So what does the memo mean for future immigration cases? While there are no categorical pronouncements that all DREAM act students shall receive deferred action or all Secure Communities cases will be halted, the Administration—by articulating the kinds of factors that should go into good decision-making—is signaling both what it finds important and what types of cases merit at least an individualized assessment. This is a long overdue contribution to smart immigration enforcement.
People need clear direction but they also need clear authority to know that they have the power—the responsibility, actually—to consider every single case as an individual life rather than a tally mark. Discretion is a difficult thing to exercise, but it is even harder when you have no sense that anyone will stand behind you. If ICE officials follow the guidance in this memo, they can take some comfort in knowing that individual discretion has been sanctioned from the top.
Admittedly, turning the latest Morton memo into reality will require a lot of hard work and monitoring both inside and outside the government. But government officials and advocates now have a new tool for doing the right thing—and wise use of it promises to improve our immigration system one case at a time.
Photo by ICE.gov.
Loading tweets...
3 comments
8 pings
Skip to comment form ↓
Kat
June 21, 2011 at 2:29 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
But regardless of how much more detailed his new instructions are compared to last year’s memo, one thing remains the same – there is no mechanism whereby to implement the stated priorities. DHS has already admitted that their agents in the field feel differently about things than do the heads at the top – in fact, the field agents held a “no confidence” vote because they do not share Morton’s stated priorities from his last memo (they feel everyone should be deported). So how to compel ICE agents in the field to comply? Also, it still is the case that when local officials such as Joe Arpaio apprehend someone, based on their own priorities, DHS will still come pick them up regardless of whether they fall into the state priorities or not. Without a mechanism of implementation, this is pure window dressing.
sam tabaziba
June 29, 2011 at 10:47 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Do not look at the memo only through the window of Joe Arpaio at the border. There are many other vulnerable populations caught up in the immigration system. They came here legitimately but got caught up in the immigration system quagmire while trying to do the right thing. This memo should serve them well if properly implemented by ICE officials.
Obamaisanass
October 16, 2011 at 11:08 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
What happend to thr good old days when an illegal was put on bus the next day and deported? since when do these people get to object to their deportation?
What about Obama’s uncle? was he deported? The last news I heard he was giggling in court?
RSS Feeds Network » Mary Giovagnoli: What ICE’s Latest Memo on Prosecutorial Discretion Means for Future Immigration Cases
June 21, 2011 at 3:05 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
[...] at Immigration Impact and Daily [...]
ICE Focusing on Dangerous Criminals | LA Progressive
November 18, 2011 at 11:03 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
[...] discretion. The package of initiatives are a follow up to ICE Director John Morton’s June 17th memo which describes how, when, and why ICE officials should exercise prosecutorial discretion in [...]
With the American 2012 presidential campaign on the move, the immigrant rights movement is once more at a crossroads iii Part B The Victories And Accomplishments « larayueladejavier
January 18, 2012 at 8:02 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
[...] turn, makes them eligible for a work permit. Initially the move was only lauded by the nonpartisan Immigration Policy Center and AILA, the American Immigration Lawyers Bar Association as smart policy moves. The broad social [...]
Deporting A Cause Celebre: The Case Of Pedro Gutierrez | NewsTaco
April 18, 2012 at 10:00 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
[...] prior to the Morton memo suddenly doesn’t qualify.” In June 2011, ICE director John Morton issued a memorandum outlining the Obama administration’s position on prosecuting deportation cases against [...]
One year later: Report shows Morton Memo hasn’t delivered on promises of relief « Reform Immigration For America
June 11, 2012 at 12:42 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
[...] June 17 marks the one year anniversary of the release of a memo from ICE Director John Morton that lead to the announcement of prosecutorial discretion to clear non-criminal deportation [...]
Advocates Call on Obama Administration to Protect Immigrant Families, Not Deport Them - LA Progressive
June 11, 2012 at 9:44 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
[...] Not Deport ThemBy Seth HoyPhoto by Pete SouzaNearly a year ago, ICE Director John Morton issued a memo on prosecutorial discretion which led to the review of 300,000 immigration cases in removal [...]
Raisa » Archive » Deporting a cause celebre: the case of Pedro Gutierrez
June 30, 2012 at 1:58 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
[...] June 2011, ICE director John Morton issued a memorandum outlining the Obama administration’s position on prosecuting deportation cases against [...]
Happy Thanksgiving | Pari Sheth Law Offices & Legal Blog
July 31, 2012 at 10:51 am (UTC -5) Link to this comment
[...] Thanks to Peter S. Vincent, ICE Principal Legal Advisor who has ensured us that incoming and pending immigration court cases will conform to ICE’s civil enforcement priorities as described in the 6/17/11 John Morton memorandum. What does the prosecutorial discretion memo mean? [...]