New Data Highlights Devastating Impact of Secure Communities on Immigrant and Latino Communities

Written by on November 2, 2011 in Enforcement, Interior Enforcement with 3 Comments

New data on the Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) controversial Secure Communities reveals the program’s devastating impact on immigrants, Latinos and U.S. citizens. Released by the Warren Institute at Berkeley Law School, the report, “Secure Communities by the Numbers,” examines the profile of individuals who have been apprehended through the program and funneled through the system. The results are startling. Many communities, in fact, are questioning their level of cooperation with the government on certain aspects of this flawed enforcement program.

The report finds that Secure Communities:

  • Leads to costly mistakes: Approximately 3,600 U.S. citizens have been arrested by ICE through the program.
  • Affects American families: More than 1/3 of those arrested through the program have a US citizen spouse or child.
  • Disproportionately affects Latinos:  Latinos make up 93% of those arrested through S-Comm—disproportionately more than their 77% of the unauthorized population.
  • Results in a lack of due process and violation of civil rights:  Only 24% of those arrested through Secure Communities who had an immigration hearing were represented by an attorney—far less than the 41% of all immigrants in immigration court who have lawyers. They are more likely to be placed in detention, spend more time in detention and are unlikely to get out on bond.
  • Does not result in relief: Only 2% of those arrested through S-Comm were granted some form of relief from deportation, compared to 14% of all immigrants in immigration court who are granted relief.

Given the litany of problems inherent in the program, communities are not only questioning the government’s management of Secure Communities, but passing policies to limit cooperation.

In New York, a U.S. District Judge recently ordered the government to turn over documents expected to explain why ICE at first made participation in Secure Communities optional, then mandatory. Advocates hope “the judge’s order will shine light on a program plagued with secrecy and lies.”

Santa Clara County, CA recently passed an ordinance acknowledging that immigration detainers issued by the federal government are requests and are not mandatory. Furthermore, holding immigrants in detention while they wait for ICE to take the immigrant into custody costs the county money. Under the new ordinance, Santa Clara county officials will still hold immigrants that have been convicted of a serious or violent crime, but can choose to ignore other detainers.

In Washington, D.C., Mayor Vincent Gray signed an executive order prohibiting the practice of holding immigrants on ICE detainers for longer than the legally mandated 48-hour period. (The American Immigration Council and other organizations have documented the abuse of the 48-hour rule by local law enforcement agencies.)

The problems with Secure Communities are so wide spread that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appointed a task force to recommend fixes for the program. While the task force submitted a list of recommendations in late September, DHS has yet to respond. Meanwhile, DHS recently announced record high deportation numbers for this year—many of which include immigrants identified through Secure Communities who do not have a serious criminal conviction.

Photo by

Tags: , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed
  • Pingback: Overzealous ICE: 3600 U.S. citizens arrested through ICE’s secure communities program | Amoachi & Johnson, Attorneys at Law, PLLC()

  • Pingback: Secure Communities Has Devastating Impact | LA Progressive()

  • Tang

    The way SC works is pretty simple. Once someone was arrested and fingerprinted, those prints are sent to the State and to the FBI. The FBI then sends the prints to ICE where they are checked against a database of subjects that have been previously encountered. If there is a match, an Immigration Alien Query is sent to the Law Enforcement Support Center with the subjects’ information. The LESC looks at the database and searched for the subject legal status and responds accordingly.

    The fingerprints that are initially sent, are from ANYONE booked in and fingerprinted. These people are citizen, legal migrant, non-immigrant, and illegal alike.

    The fact of the matter is that there are a lot more Latino’s that have been previously encountered than any other group – and therefore are already in the system when that fingerprint is checked.

    When a subject is arrested for committing a crime, and the Law Enforcement Agency checks to see if the subject is in fact legal or not. If the subject is not legal, it is much more cost effective for the local LEA to release the subject to ICE for removal, than it is to pursue the case in court and follow through with criminal convictions. Obviously the more involved the possible court hearing, the more money is saved when the subject is deported. THIS is what is often meant by “Non-criminal” illegal aliens. Of course, not for all, but one would have to look at a case by case basis to see just what the charges were that were dropped upon release of the subject to ICE.

    The good news about agencies who are refusing to honor Federal Immigration Detainers, is that the subjects will have a better chance of going through the COMPLETE cycle. It could be that we actually get more criminal convictions this way, as opposed to what is happening now. Trials ARE costly, but this is how the Justice System is supposed to work. No early out’s of the process.