A Breakdown of DHS’s Deferred Action for DREAMers

While today’s headlines assess the significance of President Obama’s deferred action announcement on Friday, many are still sorting through the news to get answers to basic questions about who is covered under the new program. Prior to President Obama’s statement that DHS would halt the deportation of immigrant youth who met criteria similar to the DREAM Act, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano released a memo and a set of questions and answers that outline eligibility and a basic timeline for implementing the new directive .

The memo, which builds upon earlier memos on law enforcement priorities and prosecutorial discretion, directs DHS officials to exercise their discretion to grant deferred action to qualified youth.  Deferred action is a form of prosecutorial discretion that allows an individual to remain temporarily in the United States and apply for work authorization.  It does not confer any kind of permanent residence, nor is it an amnesty.  Under this program, deferred action would be granted for two year increments and would be renewable.

According to Napolitano’s memo, people may apply for deferred action if they meet all the following criteria:

  • came to the U.S. under the age of 16;
  • are not above the age of 30;
  • have resided in the U.S. for 5 consecutive years as of the date of the memo;
  • are currently in school, have graduated from high school, obtained a GED or have been honorably discharged from the armed forces; and
  • have not been convicted of a felony offense, a significant misdemeanors, multiple misdemeanors or  who do not pose a threat to national security or public safety.

Specifically, DHS advised that:

  • Effective immediately, ICE, CBP, and USCIS agents should not place individuals into removal proceedings who meet the above criteria.
  • For those already IN immigration proceedings and who have been offered administrative closure under the previous prosecutorial discretion review program, ICE will begin making determinations about deferred action immediately.  For other persons who are in removal proceedings, ICE is directed to implement the program within 60 days.
  • For those NOT in removal proceedings, which is the vast majority of individuals affected by the new announcement, USCIS has been directed to devise a plan within 60 days that allows people 15 and older to affirmatively apply for  both deferred action and work authorization (those granted deferred action through ICE will apply to USCIS for work authorization as well).  People with final orders of removal will also apply to USCIS.

HOWEVER, during a White House briefing today, ICE Director John Morton urged qualifying individuals to NOT turn themselves into ICE or CBP.  Rather he advised them to wait for announcement of the formal application process. He also warned that everyone should beware of scam artists and notarios who will try to take advantage of the public. Also today, USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas pledged to actively engage the public in creating a process that is workable and transparent. Similarly, ICE will use its Public Advocate’s office to both screen inquiries and conduct outreach.

The American Immigration Lawyer’s Association (AILA) also advises “individuals who are about to be removed and who believe they can demonstrate that they satisfy the eligibility criteria should immediately contact either the Law Enforcement Support Center’s hotline at 1-855-448-6903 (staffed 24 hours a day, 7 days a week) or the ICE Office of the Public Advocate through the Office’s hotline at 1-888-351-4024 (staffed 9am – 5pm, Monday – Friday) or by e-mail at EROPublicAdvocate@ice.dhs.gov.

Photo by MDGovpics.

email

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed

7 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. David says:

    Guidance on below inquiry please

    What offenses qualify as a “significant misdemeanor”?
    A significant misdemeanor is a federal, state, or local criminal offense punishable by no more than one
    year of imprisonment or even no imprisonment that involves: violence, threats, or assault, including
    domestic violence; sexual abuse or exploitation; burglary, larceny, or fraud; driving under the influence of
    alcohol or drugs; obstruction of justice or bribery; unlawful flight from arrest, prosecution, or the scene of
    an accident; unlawful possession or use of a firearm; drug distribution or trafficking; or unlawful
    possession of drugs.
    +++
    for sakes of argument lets say below is what I could have been punished with:

    Punishment and Sentencing for a Misdemeanor California DUI — First Offense

    When convicted of driving under the influence for the first time, the potential penalties are as follows6:

    Informal (otherwise known as “summary”) probation for three to five years,

    Up to six months in a county jail

    Between $390-$1,000 in fines,

    A three- or nine-month court-approved alcohol and/or drug education program (AB541 class),

    http://www.shouselaw.com/drunk-driving-penalties.html#first

    ++
    As punishment could have only been charged up to six months imprisonment and not one year , does this mean I have not been convicted of a “SIGNIFICANT MISDEMEANOR AS DEFINED” as defined above ?

  2. california says:

    what good is it if they pass a dream act, that only lets say a couple thousands will be eligible for. . they are makin the rules very very strict, and very slim chances, is this how obama plans to beat ramney, if they can work better on improving chances for many undocumentated immigrants , then he will get more votes,

    • Francisco says:

      The number is around 800,000 , not just a couple. And I qualify , it’s not that hard to qualify for the dream act , just don’t mess around and be smart, this country has to many criminals already it doesn’t need more.

    • I.R says:

      I also qualify. (Actually thought the requirements weren’t that much strict) and I totally agree with Francisco.
      In a way, BECAUSE of criminals, its been hard for us to finally be legal. And by “us” I’m referring to the ones that actually concentrate and like school and actually want a career and be productive for this country,

  3. Pedro says:

    Sometimes the police sets you up for something you didn’t do.you are then tried unfairly and get a conviction because of a crooked police officer that just stereotypes. Lets say you get charged for a felony, but already did your time and been on the right path for the last few years you should still qualify. Everyone deserves a second chance. we all make mistakes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


4 × nine =

Top