Don’t Jump to Conclusions About Costs of Deferred Action

The Associated Press (AP) reported yesterday that the deferred action initiative for eligible, young immigrants, which is still under development, could cost more than $585 million.  While some critics immediately jumped on this as proof that taxpayers would be made to pay for the new initiative, that’s just not the way things work at USCIS.  While taxpayers foot the bill for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Custom and Border Patrol operations, (including the cost of detention and deportation of immigrants) the public doesn’t routinely foot the bill for programs administered by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.  In fact, it’s much more likely that the deferred action initiative will be paid for by the people who use it.

Despite an overblown headline, the AP article merely outlined estimates for a range of different issues that go into planning the implementation of a new initiative at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Furthermore, DHS has not finalized its plans for implementing the deferred action initiative, and without seeing the documents, which have not been made public, there is no way to know how reliable these estimates really are. Furthermore, as the article goes on to explain, the vast majority of the cost is expected to be offset by application fees.

Secretary Napolitano has already stated that immigrants applying for deferred action would be charged an application fee.  DHS has not yet announced how much this fee will be, but it will have to be set high enough to cover the costs of processing.  In addition, applicants will likely have to pay $380 for employment authorization, and another $85 for fingerprints.  Potentially, some applicants who can prove financial hardship will receive a fee waiver, although the details of that process are also still unknown.

Taxpayers do not pay for the vast majority of services provided by USCIS – immigrants and U.S. citizens who apply for benefits pay for it themselves.  USCIS is primarily a fee funded agency and receives few appropriations from Congress.  For example, the President’s 2013 budget requested $143 million for USCIS and, unlike past years, did not request any appropriations to cover the cost of refugee and asylum applications (these applicants are not charged fees).  Congress is likely to appropriate much less than what the President has asked for, with most of it going toward E-Verify.

The remainder of USCIS’s $3 billion budget is paid from the examinations fee account which collects fees that immigrants, U.S. Citizens, and businesses pay when filing applications for immigration benefits.  These fees have been rising steadily in recent years in order to cover the agency’s overhead and other costs, such as refugee processing.

Of course, implementing deferred action will come with costs.  But those who immediately want to pounce on DHS for creating yet another expensive program that taxpayers will have to pay for don’t have the facts or their history straight.  Application fees – those paid by applicants for deferred action as well as those paid by others seeking immigration benefits – will have to be the source of revenue, because it’s unlikely to come from anywhere else.

email

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed

3 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. Jeffrey says:

    The supposed cost estimates don’t take into account the higher taxes that will be paid by young college grads who can emerge from the underground economy and work in the formal economy at a professional level. Freeing these people to work to their potential will be a boon for the U.S. in every respect.

  2. Thank you for identifying the mistakes in the AP article. When immigrants apply for benefits, they pay for them. In fact, they pay more than their fair share as immigration fees also include the cost of processing asylee and refugee benefit applications. DREAMers were raised in the United States, and deserve a chance to apply to regularize their status. They don’t deserve misinformation that will be used to fuel anti-immigrant sentiment.

    Heather Stewart, NAFSA: Association of International Educators

  3. clarence james says:

    During the years i had my green card i had applied for citizenship and waited almost a year before writing a letter concerning my status,i ended up paying hundreds of dollars and had to go to court.My lawyer sucked didn’t represent 100%.Every piece of document that i have is from the government and for 14yrs.i worked and paid my taxes and now that i’m out of a job i can’t get any benefits,to me it seems that my American dream is slowly fading but one thing i have in my corner is FAITH.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


4 + three =

Top