Doing the Math: Immigration Detention Costs a Pretty Penny

By Dan Gordon, Communications Associate, National Immigration Forum

Congress will return to Washington after Labor Day amid talk of a “fiscal cliff,” yet loath to address the steep price American taxpayers shoulder to detain immigrants.

Many of these immigrants pose no threat to the American public and they could be placed in less expensive alternatives to detention. In this belt-tightening era, the excessive amount we spend on immigration detention should be subjected to careful scrutiny.

The President’s fiscal year 2013 budget request for DHS Custody Operations, which includes immigration detention, rounds to a cool $2 billion.  According to the National Immigration Forum’s newly updated “The Math of Immigration Detention,” we’d be spending about $5.4 million a day on detaining immigrants. Divided among 32,800 daily detention beds, that comes to $164 per day for each immigrant.

Believe it or not, that would be an improvement: This fiscal year we’re spending an additional $91 million for 1,200 more beds than the President requested for the 2013 fiscal year.

The House of Representatives has expressed no interest even in relatively minuscule savings. In fact, it wants to keep all of those expensive detention beds.

Yes, it’s politically unpopular — particularly in an election year — to cut any fat from our immigration enforcement budget. But as the January 2, 2013, effective date of the Budget Control Act approaches, cuts will have to come from somewhere.

To put it simply, alternatives to detention is a good candidate for savings. Forget $91 million — by detaining and deporting only those immigrants who pose a threat to public safety and by employing community-based alternatives to detention for others, the government could save up to $1.6 billion a year. Such alternatives have a daily cost per detainee ranging from 30 cents to $14 — a much better deal than $164.  These alternatives are also highly effective.

Such cuts would go hand-in-hand with Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s policy of focusing its resources on those convicted of dangerous, violent crimes. The implementation of this “prosecutorial discretion” has been very limited so far. Better use of prosecutorial discretion would keep aspiring citizens who pose no public-safety risk out of our bloated detention system.

In addition, reducing our reliance on detention would keep taxpayer dollars from flowing into the coffers of private prison corporations, which give millions of dollars each year to lobbyists and political campaigns. Nearly half of immigration detainees were held in private prisons as of 2011. And detainees at such facilities have been subjected to abuse and poor conditions. Many have lodged complaints.

Congress may temporarily resign itself to keeping the government running at current funding levels when it convenes in September. But in the end, even the politically untouchable Department of Homeland Security is going to face budget cuts.

When that time comes, Congress must do the right thing and trim the excessive costs of our immigration-detention system.

email

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed
  • http://facebook Sabrina

    I think it is harsh that they keep the one locked up for things that everyone else does that are like low charges.I was always told treat people equal regardless on what race,language,or anything to make someone different.I dont understand all these laws they really make me sick.If you come down too it the way they are doing them are pretty much the same as slavery.No one should go though that not even if you are Ilegal.I do understand that it isnt right for them to get away with things but they should be let out just like the American given a chance to life their life in a better place so they can make money for their family.If we dont have them here we will lose all our crops of important things that we need to live.The farmer loses out on their money and everything.I hope the United States will treat everyone equal regardless of anything about them.They should give the ones that are trying to follow the rules a chance to get a permanet residence here like they gave others back in the day from other countries.It isnt fair to man kind to treat them differently then other because the others also speak different languages.The are not following what it says in they rules of US Contitustion or The Ten Amendments.Why make rules if they arent followed.

  • MdeG

    This is all true, but there are far more important reasons to oppose the present immigration detention system.

    Private prisons. Mistreatment of prisoners. The fundamental rottenness of our national immigration system. The US’s complicity in many of the awful conditions that these folks are trying to escape in their countries of origin.

    I would love to know where the financial tie between CCA and Kobach lies. That, to me, is a far more interesting question, and lies somewhat nearer the root of this corruption.

  • http://www.stephengusslawfirm.com STEPHEN GUSS

    I understand that it costs $169.00 a day per inmate @ the Fair.fax County, Virginia
    Adult Detention Center. What a waste of taxpayers money for non violent detainees.S

  • Elaine Fooshee

    When someone came to this country for asylum fleeing Somalia because of the violence there and as an English Teacher and believer inhuman rights he was targeted with threats of violence from persons in Somalia. On those basis, he has been detained in the Steward Detention Center in Lumpkin, GA since December 2010 – – Mohamed Jama # A 200564730. And taxpayers are billed $60,000 per year for this profit corporate private prison expense.
    Does Congress have connections to this prison and have a “kick-back”????
    More of us should be concerned!!!!

Top