Procedural Path Of The Senate Immigration Bill

Written by on June 10, 2013 in Legislation, Reform with 4 Comments

UntitledThe Senate immigration reform debate has officially begun. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) filed cloture on the motion to proceed Thursday on S. 744, the “Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act,” the first step to having the full Senate debate the measure after the Senate Judiciary Committee approved it a few weeks ago. Senators started to make their cases for and against the bill during floor speeches on Friday. On Tuesday, the Senate will vote to end debate on the motion to proceed to the immigration bill at 2:15 p.m. Tuesday and then vote to proceed at 4 p.m.

What happens when there’s a motion to proceed?

When the Senate votes on a motion to proceed to consider, it means they’re voting to begin debate about the substance of the bill. It’s the way to bring a measure to the floor where there is not unanimous consent. For legislative business, it is debatable and may be subject to filibuster, which means there must be at least 60 votes to prevent a filibuster. Notably, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) said he would vote in favor of the motion to proceed even though he was voting against the bill in committee. And Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) also has said he’d vote for the motion to proceed. “With regard to getting started on the bill, it’s my intention…to vote for the motion to proceed so we can get on the bill and see if it we’re able to pass a bill that actually moves the ball in the right direction,” he said on the last day of committee markup.

What comes after that?

This is the point during which senators can add amendments to the bill on the Senate floor. Debate on a measure is unlimited unless cloture is invoked, so senators can speak for as long as they like. And amendments do not have to relate directly to the bill. After the smooth markup process in the Senate Judiciary Committee, the floor fight over the immigration bill is expected to be more combative. It also could be more disjointed compared to the committee’s tight process, where amendments were posted online days in advance and the committee debated them mostly in order. In comparison, senators on the floor can call up any amendment once they have been recognized, whether it is related or not. Senators who are designated as floor managers will organize the process. And as during the committee markup, senators can offer second-degree amendments to the ones that their colleagues propose. They can also consider substitutes to the amendments, and in those situations, “senators can propose six or more first- and second-degree amendments to the substitute and the measure before any votes must occur,” according to the Senate process.

What amendments might come up?

The most contentious amendments will be the ones about border security requirements. Some senators do not agree that the Gang of Eight’s border provisions are strong enough, including Cornyn. He will propose the RESULTS amendment, which includes a laundry list of metrics—including a biometric entry-exit system and 100 percent monitoring of the southern border—that must be met before green cards could be offered to undocumented immigrants. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) has said he will offer an amendment to require undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children to obtain a degree or serve in the military before they could be eligible for the expedited path to citizenship. And Senate Judiciary Committee members likely will raise amendments withdrawn during markup. For example, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) said he is “seriously considering” bringing up a gun control amendment to the Senate bill that he withdrew during markup before the committee could vote on it.

What about the final vote?

To reach a vote on S. 744’s final passage, there will be a cloture vote, or a motion to close debate (although debate can continue for a set time afterwards) again requiring 60 votes. This is where the varying reports about whether or not there are 60 senators who will vote for the bill come in. Some say they have the votes, while others disagree. But more senators are saying they are in favor of the bill. Over the weekend, Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) announced her support for the Senate immigration bill. But the Senate vote is only part of the congressional process. Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) is pushing for the House to take up an immigration bill while the Senate works on theirs, and if the two chambers pass separate pieces of legislation, then it will go to a conference committee to hammer out the differences.

Photo Courtesy of C-Span.

Tags: , , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed
  • history continues to repeat itself. When the slaves were brought in from Africa in the 15th century for labor and freed in the 19th century, they did not take over American jobs or cause harm to the American people. The undocumented or unauthourized are not only here because they so choose, but there are many “Farmers” conglomerates who “recruit” them from central Mexico so they can work their many thousand acre farms for next to nothing. Mexico has 52 million who are below our own poverty level making less than $52.00 a month if you have it good. Our land of America was built into the soil for lush plants we have today by the hands of the Mexicans from the late 1800’s through 1942, and continuing to the present. Only after the railroad and industry took off and the influx from the Mexican Revolution brought so many Mexicans to work the land and stayed to make the United States their home, which by the way had belonged to Spain, (but, you can read up on that!), that the Border Patrol was put up in 1924. Then the “Bracero Program” came into affect during WWII, where the Mexicans were called on again to work in the States, this time they had set wages, hours, and went home to their families. After the war they became ILLEGAL’s. They are no more ILLEGAL, than an American born in Canada or another Foreign born parent who has children in the U.S. Oh yes, the original Natives of the Americas were very few, and it was the Immigrants from Germany, Ireland, and the Norway/Sweden who built our country while the Mexicans worked along side them before them and after them. I have my hopes and believe that one day our country will close down the prison gates, without a 16-19 year wait on citizenship protocol, and then we can all work with the sweat of our amigo’s doing what they do best loving the land and proud of what they do. They only want respect to match their integrity, poor or not.

  • I agree with you Mira more then 110%. We all come here illegally and no one sees that, all person see is that they are darker skin, they speak spanish and taking “Americans jobs” but let me give you people advise, they bleed the blood as we do, yes they speak spanish but its a beautiful language, and as for the job thing, do you honestly say that you Americans will be willing to work in the fields for 12 to 14 hours a day and get paid less then $8 dollars an hour? I think not, you know why that is, its called pure laziness and self centered and most of all want to be able to complain about Mexicanos and other races taking Americans jobs. To be honest with you I think its lame and poor excuse for an American to act like that. I also think that Americans are showing that its not a land of the free, its the land of you better be American or we dont like you.

  • Pingback: What's Next With the Senate Immigration Reform Bill?NCLR Blog()

  • Pingback: Reform Rundown: the American Congress and Immigration | The Migrationist()