Deferred Action for Undocumented Immigrants Could Add Billions in Taxes to U.S. Economy

Written by on September 5, 2014 in DACA/DAPA, Economics, Tax Contributions with 2 Comments

6757856139_a3988deaff_bThere’s no question that improving the United States’ outdated immigration system would help the economy. The Senate-passed immigration bill S. 744 would have, if enacted, reduced the federal budget deficit by approximately $1 trillion over 20 years and led to an increase in wages for U.S. workers. But House leaders failed to bring up S. 744 or any immigration reform bill for consideration. Now, after months of congressional inaction, President Obama is expected to announce in the coming months administrative action that would temporarily help repair the broken immigration system. While the benefits would not be as sweeping as comprehensive legislative reform, providing deferred action to undocumented immigrants currently living and working in the U.S. would still be a boost for the economy.

A new report from the Center for American Progress (CAP), The Fiscal Benefits of Temporary Work Permits by Patrick Oakford, explains, providing temporary deportation relief to potentially millions of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. would allow them to come out of the shadows and register to receive work permits. That would also trigger significant economic benefits through the payroll taxes these workers would pay. “Today, slightly more than one-third of undocumented workers and their employers are contributing payroll taxes,” Oakford writes. “Providing work permits would create a legal avenue for workers and employers to contribute taxes.” Additionally, offering undocumented immigrants a way to work legally will lead to higher wages—as well as higher payroll taxes—and allow them to move around in the work force to find a job that best fits their skills.

The economic benefits of deferred action, however, vary based on the number of immigrants who will be eligible for relief in whatever program the administration announces, according to Oakford:

There are a number of criteria that President Obama could choose from when determining who will be eligible for deferred action. For example, deferred action may only be available to those who have been in the United States for at least 10 years. Alternatively, the president could extend deferred action to those who would have been able to apply for legal status and citizenship under the immigration reform bill, S. 744, passed by the Senate in June 2013.

If the administration offered deferred action to immigrants who had been in the U.S. for at least 10 years, for example, potentially 7.4 million people could be eligible. Based on the CAP report, that would lead to roughly $4.5 billion in payroll tax gains in the first year. But if deferred action applies to immigrants who have been in the U.S. for at least five years, then it could encompass nearly 10 million people and add $6 billion in payroll tax gains in the first year.

No one knows when President Obama could announce administrative action or what the deferred action program could look like, but the CAP report is one more reminder of how deep an impact immigration reform can have on the U.S. economy.

Photo by 401(k) 2012.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed
  • Ali Alexander

    IF we were at full employment, this might be true, but we have high unemployment and the lowest workforce participate rate in more than 30 years. AMERICANS doing the jobs illegal aliens have or would get with work permits would pay every bit as much and more in taxes, as well as spending on consumption. They’re contribute quite possibly MORE because illegal aliens depress wages, which in turn depresses taxes and consumption.

    • mary

      To add to your argument, what makes the writer of this article think the people who are employing these illegals now would put them on the legitimate payroll? As long as they can produce their “green card” documentation for anyone who comes on the work-site, what stops them from still paying them under the table? Do they really think that employers who employ illegals without paying payroll taxes or insurance on them in the past would suddenly comply with the law? What a joke!